Showing posts with label epidemic. Show all posts
Showing posts with label epidemic. Show all posts
Fructose is Behind the Diabesity Epidemic
Sunday, May 11, 2014
(Article first published as Why You Can’t Lose Weight: Study Finds Fructose Behind the Diabesity Epidemic on Technorati.)
Fructose is fast becoming a new type of four-letter word among people trying to lose weight and those health conscious individuals concerned about excess dietary sugar and increased risk of metabolic diseases including diabetes. The medical profession has coined the phrase ‘diabesity’, as diabetes and obesity frequently coexist. High fructose corn syrup (HFCS) was introduced into our food supply in the early 70’s and obesity rates have steadily increased in tandem with fructose consumption since that time.
Researchers have demonstrated that calories from drinks and foods containing fructose are metabolized differently than the same calories from table sugar. While both sugars contain empty calories, fructose is converted to fat in the liver and doesn’t register as an available energy source that the body can use to power metabolic activities. This means that the proper hormonal signals aren’t transmitted to the brain telling you to stop eating, as is the case with traditional sugar sources. The tendency is to overeat and fat is quickly stored from fructose metabolism.
Most people known that fructose is a form of sugar derived from fruit. While some people may need to limit fruit due to existing metabolic problems, this form of fructose is not the cause of the obesity and diabetic dilemma. Fructose from fruit is tightly bound with fiber and releases slowly. Refined fructose, especially in the form of HFCS has been processed to optimize sweetness.

Diabetes cases have similarly grown over the past 40 years and it is now expected that more than half of the US population will be prediabetic or diabetic by 2020. There’s no mistake making the connection between increased dietary fructose from sweetened beverages and processed foods to the explosion of overweight, obese and diabetic Americans.
Fructose Rapidly Breaks Down and Becomes Belly Fat

Study Links Fructose to Obesity and Diabetes
Due to government subsidies, inexpensive HFCS has found its way into virtually every processed food source. It’s nearly impossible to avoid the sweetener unless you eat a raw, natural diet, as HFCS is added into everything from baked goods and breads to hot dogs and condiments The results of a study published in the Journal of the American Society of Nephrology makes the link between fructose consumption and the dramatic rise in obesity rates over the past 40 years. The study also cited a connection with hypertension and renal disease.
Controlling Weight by Understanding the Impact of Fructose

Once you get a taste for fructose, even table sugar doesn’t seem as sweet. The important point is that fructose has the same number of calories as any sugar source, but it doesn’t register properly with our brain and leads to overeating and excess fat production and storage.
Nutritional researchers continue to make the connection between fructose, obesity and increased risk of diabetes. The best way to avoid fructose is move away from processed foods and drink, favoring foods in their natural form. Read all nutritional labels diligently, as manufacturers are allowed to use a variety of different terms to indicate the presence of the sweetener. Cut your dependence on fructose and its derivatives to hit your target weight goal and prevent metabolic disease.
The Diabetes Epidemic Dont Be a Statistic!
Saturday, February 22, 2014
Health professionals are perplexed by the sudden explosion of diabetes cases. Teen and pre-teen children are developing the disease in record numbers, predisposing them to a lifetime of increased risk of heart disease, cancer, stroke, blindness and dialysis. What has changed to cause this alarming uptick in diabetes over the last 40 years, and how can we protect ourselves from this insidious malady?
Statistics show that diabetes and pre-diabetes has increased by 33% over the last 40 years. By some estimates, nearly 1 in 10 Americans is either diabetic or showing metabolic signs which will quickly become a full blown case of the disease, although many people are unaware they have the condition. The question is, what has changed over this time to have caused this epidemic? While there are a number of factors which have contributed to the dilemma, many health researchers are narrowing in on two key suspects: High Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS) and Systemic Inflammation.
How can we place blame for the diabetes rise on an all-natural sweetener such as HFCS? Beginning in the early 1970s, the use of this sweetener was increasing as an inexpensive additive, subsidized by the government to allow farmers to plant massive amounts of the crop. It began showing up in every soft drink, fast foods and baked goods. Today you would be hard pressed to find any processed food which does not contain HFCS or a derivitive. Recent studies are now demonstrating that HFCS is not processed by the liver, and theore does not trigger the natural mechanism used by our body to detect and process calories. Our brain does not register the sweetener as caloric intake, causing us to continue eating. We never get the full signal. Further evidence is now emerging that HFCS causes insulin to become resistant to the proper metabolism of glucose in the blood, meaning that sugars are not efficiently ushered into our cells for energy. The sad truth about this corn-based product is that it really is not a natural food element. it has been processed by man and is not viewed a digestible food by our body. It is actually seen as an invading enemy which causes our body to mount an offensive through the immune response. While this is a normal response to an infection, it is not good for the body to engage the HFCS enemy every time we eat. This leads to low-grade inflammation which is known to be the root cause of many diseases, including diabetes, cardiovascular disease and many cancers.
We dont have to look far today to see the exponentially increasing population of overweight and obese individuals. Upwards of 70% of adults in most Western countries fall into one of these two classifications. And new studies now confirm that excess body fat (especially around the mid section) is a direct cause of inflammation throughout the body. The common belief for many years was that fat was an inert cellular matrix within the body which was simply unsightly. We now understand that our fat is a living organ which sends cellular signals to our organs when in distress. We hear that signal loud and clear. Body fat has an amazing capacity to expand, and evolutionary design which has allowed our species to flourish for many generations. But, this same mechanism of survival may also be our downfall. Once our fat tissues (adipocytes) have multiplied and expanded to maximum capacity, they release chemical messengers into the blood stream which cause systemic inflammation. Levels of homocysteine and C-reactive protein rise in the blood, which in turn causes excessive levels of inflammation in our tissues, as our immune system attempts to fight the never ending surge of inflammation-mediated byproducts. All of this was necessary from an evolutionary perspective, as our bodies adapted to stress factors related to everyday living. But today, these deep rooted survival mechanisms are the root of our diabetic and cardiovascular problems. This metabolic disturbance is directly related to the initiation of diabetes, as it upsets the intricate hormonal balance within our body.
How then to avoid a lifetime of misery from diabetic complications? To begin, it is essential to eliminate high fructose corm syrup products from the diet. This is much easier said than done for most. It means the elimination of all ined and packaged foods including breads, pasta, cereals and any wheat or corn based items. Switch from soft drinks to natural drinks such as tea and water. Monitor your blood sugar by picking up an inexpensive meter at the local drug store. Your target goal is a fasting reading of 70 - 85 (72 is optimal), and never higher than 90. An even more important test is after meals. Test 1 and 2 hours after eating, and target a 1 hour reading of no more than 140, and a 2 hour reading no higher than 120. Adjust your food choices accordingly, as different people have different carbohydrate tolerance levels. New studies indicate that pancreatic beta cells begin to die off at blood glucose levels above 140. Once the beta cell population is depleted, you are an insulin-dependent diabetic, and have doubled your chance of developing cardiovascular disease. By following some simple dietary guidelines, we can dramatically reduce our chances of being afflicted with diabetes, and must work hard to protect our children from the ravages of this horrible disease.
Historical Context Part 6 The Obesity Epidemic
Sunday, February 2, 2014
As Ive talked about in previous posts, the government began making dietary recommendations in 1977, beginning with Senator George McGoverns Dietary Goals for the United States. The torch was then passed to the USDA in 1980, which began drafting dietary recommendations every five years. The most recent USDA Dietary Guidelines for Americans came out at the end of 2010. For all intents and purposes, the recommendations have changed very little since 1977. Lets look at some of the specifics of the governments advice here, and well see if Americans have been following it over the past few decades. First on the list, avoid foods high in saturated fat. This includes eggs (which everyone has been afraid of since that Time magazine article), red meat, and full-fat dairy. And when you cut something out of your diet, you have to replace it with something else, right? The government advised that we eat more starches, grains, and vegetable oils in the place of these high-saturated fat foods, along with more low-fat meats like chicken and fish. Well, it turns out that Americans have been following this advice. Here are a few graphs showing the recent dietary trends:





Since the 1970s, we have done exactly what was recommended for us to do. Weve eaten fewer eggs, and keep in mind also that the egg data does not take into account the countless yolks that are thrown away for fear of their artery-clogging capabilities. Until recently, an egg white omelet was a stupid idea, and rightfully so; it tastes awful. Weve reduced red meat consumption and replaced it with chicken and fish. Red meat has become a poster boy for our health problems, but its consumption has declined as Americans health has deteriorated over the past few decades. Whole milk consumption has declined immensely. Americans drink only about 1/3 of the whole milk that they did in 1970. It appears as though most Americans have switched over to low-fat or fat-free milk, which have both increased dramatically over the same time period. And then we come to grains, flour, sugar, and vegetable oil. All three of these have been on the rise in the American diet over the past few decades. Remember, the Dietary Guidelines recommended that we increase our grain consumption, and we did just that. Unfortunately, in our attempt to avoid animal fat, we also consumed more sugar. Sugar was something that was not stressed in the early Dietary Guidelines, but more recently the USDA has begun to recommend reducing sugar intake. As for vegetable oil, I could not find a graph showing its consumption, but since it didnt exist before the mid 20th century and now its considered an essential cooking item, its safe to assume its consumption has increased exponentially.
So... we followed the advice that was provided to us. We ate less red meat and saturated-fat-laden foods. We ate more grains and flour products. We chose low-fat protein sources like skim milk and chicken breast, and we cooked with vegetable oils. Well, heres what happened:


Obesity gone wild. The first graph is from 1985, which was the first year obesity statistics by state were recorded. In 1985, no state had an obesity rate over 14%. Actually, data wasnt available for every state, but West Virginia, which has the highest obesity rate today, was under 14% in 1985, so chances are that was just about the highest in the country. In 2009, only Colorado had an obesity rate under 19%, and there were 9 states with an obesity rate over 30%. You could say, based on these numbers, that the obesity rate in America has approximately doubled since 1985, maybe even more than doubled.
But dont say its because were eating too much red meat and saturated fat, because we arent. Grains, sugar, and other carbohydrates are the foods that have been on the rise in America during this period in which obesity took off. Besides, we have been eating red meat and saturated-fat-containing foods for millions of years. The obesity epidemic, and the heart disease epidemic for that matter, only began in the 20th century. As Sean Croxton of Underground Wellness always says, you cant blame new diseases on old foods. I agree completely. The culprits here are not red meat and eggs. It is our overconsumption of grains, flour, sugar, and vegetable oils that is at the core of our health problems.
But what about the heart disease epidemic? Did the recent dietary change prevent heart attacks? It actually may have. Heart disease rates have leveled off since the mid 1970s (see graph below). Of course, there are other factors involved here, like the fact that everyone and their mother is on statin drugs, which may help prevent heart disease. Im not sold on statins at all, but there is some evidence that its probably helping a few people prevent heart disease deaths. It is important to note, though, that we are only talking about heart disease deaths. Is a diet that can reduce your risk for heart disease, but increase your waistline and make your more susceptible to cancer, really the ideal diet? I dont think so....

Now here we are in 2011. The newest Dietary Guidelines have just been released, and weve still got a food pyramid that is based on a nutrient-poor food (grains) that hasnt been consumed for 99% of human history. But what else is our government to do? We as humans made a decision 10,000 years ago to commit to a grain-based diet when we adopted agriculture as our means for food production. We sacrificed our health in return for the ability to support a greater population. As a result, our modern government is obligated to support a diet that can feed the ever-increasing population; a diet based on grains that are high in calories and can be mass-produced fairly easily and inexpensively. The USDA Dietary Guidelines will NEVER adopt a lower carb Paleo Diet mindset, regardless of how clear the science is. Firstly, such a stark change in ideals would admit that theyve been wrong for the past three decades. Secondly, it would ruin the agricultural industry. Thirdly, eating an optimal human diet is just not possible for everyone to do with our current population. Like I said, we made the decision to eat a grain-based diet when we decided to adopt agriculture.
So, to conclude this six-part Historical Context series, THIS is why I reject the low-fat concept, THIS is why I think the Dietary Guidelines are ridiculous, and THIS is why I eat the way I do. I hope my position is more clear now. Thank you and goodnight.





Since the 1970s, we have done exactly what was recommended for us to do. Weve eaten fewer eggs, and keep in mind also that the egg data does not take into account the countless yolks that are thrown away for fear of their artery-clogging capabilities. Until recently, an egg white omelet was a stupid idea, and rightfully so; it tastes awful. Weve reduced red meat consumption and replaced it with chicken and fish. Red meat has become a poster boy for our health problems, but its consumption has declined as Americans health has deteriorated over the past few decades. Whole milk consumption has declined immensely. Americans drink only about 1/3 of the whole milk that they did in 1970. It appears as though most Americans have switched over to low-fat or fat-free milk, which have both increased dramatically over the same time period. And then we come to grains, flour, sugar, and vegetable oil. All three of these have been on the rise in the American diet over the past few decades. Remember, the Dietary Guidelines recommended that we increase our grain consumption, and we did just that. Unfortunately, in our attempt to avoid animal fat, we also consumed more sugar. Sugar was something that was not stressed in the early Dietary Guidelines, but more recently the USDA has begun to recommend reducing sugar intake. As for vegetable oil, I could not find a graph showing its consumption, but since it didnt exist before the mid 20th century and now its considered an essential cooking item, its safe to assume its consumption has increased exponentially.
So... we followed the advice that was provided to us. We ate less red meat and saturated-fat-laden foods. We ate more grains and flour products. We chose low-fat protein sources like skim milk and chicken breast, and we cooked with vegetable oils. Well, heres what happened:


Obesity gone wild. The first graph is from 1985, which was the first year obesity statistics by state were recorded. In 1985, no state had an obesity rate over 14%. Actually, data wasnt available for every state, but West Virginia, which has the highest obesity rate today, was under 14% in 1985, so chances are that was just about the highest in the country. In 2009, only Colorado had an obesity rate under 19%, and there were 9 states with an obesity rate over 30%. You could say, based on these numbers, that the obesity rate in America has approximately doubled since 1985, maybe even more than doubled.
But dont say its because were eating too much red meat and saturated fat, because we arent. Grains, sugar, and other carbohydrates are the foods that have been on the rise in America during this period in which obesity took off. Besides, we have been eating red meat and saturated-fat-containing foods for millions of years. The obesity epidemic, and the heart disease epidemic for that matter, only began in the 20th century. As Sean Croxton of Underground Wellness always says, you cant blame new diseases on old foods. I agree completely. The culprits here are not red meat and eggs. It is our overconsumption of grains, flour, sugar, and vegetable oils that is at the core of our health problems.
But what about the heart disease epidemic? Did the recent dietary change prevent heart attacks? It actually may have. Heart disease rates have leveled off since the mid 1970s (see graph below). Of course, there are other factors involved here, like the fact that everyone and their mother is on statin drugs, which may help prevent heart disease. Im not sold on statins at all, but there is some evidence that its probably helping a few people prevent heart disease deaths. It is important to note, though, that we are only talking about heart disease deaths. Is a diet that can reduce your risk for heart disease, but increase your waistline and make your more susceptible to cancer, really the ideal diet? I dont think so....

Now here we are in 2011. The newest Dietary Guidelines have just been released, and weve still got a food pyramid that is based on a nutrient-poor food (grains) that hasnt been consumed for 99% of human history. But what else is our government to do? We as humans made a decision 10,000 years ago to commit to a grain-based diet when we adopted agriculture as our means for food production. We sacrificed our health in return for the ability to support a greater population. As a result, our modern government is obligated to support a diet that can feed the ever-increasing population; a diet based on grains that are high in calories and can be mass-produced fairly easily and inexpensively. The USDA Dietary Guidelines will NEVER adopt a lower carb Paleo Diet mindset, regardless of how clear the science is. Firstly, such a stark change in ideals would admit that theyve been wrong for the past three decades. Secondly, it would ruin the agricultural industry. Thirdly, eating an optimal human diet is just not possible for everyone to do with our current population. Like I said, we made the decision to eat a grain-based diet when we decided to adopt agriculture.
So, to conclude this six-part Historical Context series, THIS is why I reject the low-fat concept, THIS is why I think the Dietary Guidelines are ridiculous, and THIS is why I eat the way I do. I hope my position is more clear now. Thank you and goodnight.
Are Restaurant Meals Behind the Obesity Epidemic
Friday, December 20, 2013
(Article first published as Restaurants Could Hold the Key to Weight Loss Success, or Failure? on Technorati.)

If the meal wasn’t to your liking, you wouldn’t patronize the restaurant in the future, so it’s in their best interest to serve the largest portions that appeal to your innate taste for food bursting with flavor. Meals eaten away from home pack on twice the calories as food you prepare in your own kitchen. When surveyed, chefs agree they could trim the calories and still prepare great tasting food.
Chefs Could Trim 10 to 25% From a Typical Meal

Chefs Largely Unaware of Calorie Content
The pressing question is why chefs wouldn’t make changes to reduce the calorie burden of their meals. That question was posed as part of the survey and the researchers found that 7% had no idea of the number of calories in their recipes and another 49% were only somewhat familiar.
The survey authors concluded "If a large number of chefs dont know the calorie content of their food, they will be limited in their ability to modify what they serve to guests". Chefs indicated they were more than willing to create new recipes with lower calorie counts, but were hesitant to modify their existing signature food items as they feared they may downgrade their reputation.
People Don’t Want Low Calorie Options When Dining Out
A reduced calorie or low carb menu has been tried before and most restaurants have found that these items are the “kiss of death”. When rating the obstacles to increasing the selections of healthy foods on their menu, 32% of chefs indicated that low consumer demand was the key reason. Another reason was the higher cost of the ingredients.
The Customer is King

Restaurant dining can be added near the top of the list of contributing factors to our obesity epidemic. These meals contain twice the calorie content as a home prepared meal and 3 to 4 times the number of calories that should be consumed at one meal. When making the choice to dine out, be mindful of healthy options and ask to have a meal prepared with your needs in mind. While most chefs don’t have your health interests in mind, you can take charge and use dining away from home to your weight loss advantage.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)