Showing posts with label report. Show all posts
Showing posts with label report. Show all posts
A Disease Management Care Blog Annual Report for 2011
Tuesday, May 13, 2014
Now that 2011 is gone, this is a good time for the Disease Management Care Blog pause and take stock. How is it doing?It likes to think of itself as a unique ongoing journal club on the organization, delivery and financing of health care. If the DMCB was soup, thered be three ingredients:
1) reliance, whenever possible, on peer-reviewed and published evidence,
2) a physicians "real world" experience and
3) a ready dash of skeptical humor.
The DMCB must be doing something right. Despite a narrow mix of medical science, economics, effectiveness and policy, the DMCB has attracted a relatively large and elite readership. If youre reading this, that means you.
Sophistication
When it looks at the ISPs of its many return visitors, the DMCB sees dozens of academic institutions, big and small name news media outlets, publishing houses, trade associations, information technology businesses, Congress, CMS, the White House, state government, foundations, commercial insurers, hospitals, health care consulting organizations and population management service providers. Many are household names.
It doesnt stop there. The DMCB has been contacted by and gotten to know folks from all levels in the health care industry. Based on those conversations, it knows this a smart group. The author of this blog is a better person for it.
The DMCB knows each regular visitor, twitter follower and Google subscriber has been earned one person at a time. It knows its elite readers are knowledgeable, active or interested in health policy, population health management, the patient centered medical home or primary care. These are not casual readers.
And you have a lot of company:
According to Google Analytics mix of ISP addresses and cookies, DMCB Ver. 2011 had 29,000 unique visitors with 42,000 visits. A third were repeat (defined as more than one) visits. While there is no definition of a "regular" reader, the number of visitors with more than 50 DMCB "hits" in 2011 numbered 5153. There were 786 visitors with more than 200 hits.
The DMCB also has 416 Twitter followers. According to TweetReach, the DMCB regularly reaches almost 1500 persons with its tweets. Depending on re-Tweets, that number can exceed 7000.
There are also 466 Google RSS subscribers.
These 2011 numbers suggest there are thousands of persons that regularly read the DMCB. Every individual visitor, follower and subscriber returned or opted-in based on the DMCB content and only the DMCB content. There is no marketing, emailing or use of any services to promote the DMCB. It doesnt have the advantage of a sponsoring institution or explicit link to a big-name business. And its readership continues to slowly grow.
The DMCB Web Juggernaut
The DMCB is regularly lected and linked in many prestigious web outlets, include HealthHombre, Health Affairs, KevinMD, Forbes, and many sister blogs. Its also appeared in the web sites of USAToday, Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post, Dartmouth Atlas, Business Week and the National Review. Its also been linked in the intranet web sites of many insurers, provider organizations, and health information tech companies.
And, by the way, according to YouTube, the DMCBs videos to date have had 33,486 views.
As testimony to its growing web presence, the DMCB is on the first page when the term "disease management" is Googled. The DMCBs growing web traffic has ironically made its "Comments" section a target by spammers with links to its dubious medical web sites. With only one unobtrusive Google "Ad" that generates pennies per click, it still got a check for $100 (prompting the derision of the DMCB spouse, but thats another post). The DMCB has also been offered - and used - cash to provide link backs. It also had one complaint lodged over copyright infringement over an image (the post has since been removed, with apologies). Simply put, folks are paying attention.
Last but not least, the DMCB is proud of its four 2011 peer reviewed publications in Population Health Management, Self Care and the Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research.
And a thank you....
... to the readers who have commented or emailed with feedback, comments and insights. To the readers who use their precious time and keep coming back.
You Can Be Too Clean Report
Tuesday, April 8, 2014
.jpg)
An interesting story from the Daily Record website today, highlighting research from the Rowett Institute of Nutrition and Health in Aberdeen which suggests that Scots are far too hygenic for their own good.
Speaking in the Record about the findings Dr Denise Kelly of Rowett said:
"We were able to show that environment and early life have a major impact on the type of organisms in your gut when you reach adulthood."Then we looked at how the immune system is functioning and again were able to show there is a very big difference in the immune functions.""The methods we are using are not discriminating, so though we are eliminating harmful pathogens, we are also eradicating a lot of the good organisms."
So, what is your opinion on this research - are we endangering our own and our childrens future health by being too clean?
New Guidelines For Insomnia British Report Rounds Up The Research
Monday, February 17, 2014
Recognizing that..."Sleep disorders are common in the general population and even more so in clinical practice, yet are relatively poorly understood by doctors and other health care practitioners,"... the British Association for Psychopharmacology (BAP) on Tuesday released guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of insomnia and other sleep disorders. The recommendations do not address sleep problems from apnea/hypopnea, restless legs, narcolepsy, and other conditions:
British Association For Psychopharmacology Consensus Statement On Evidence-Based Treatment Of Insomnia, Parasomnias And Circadian Rhythm Disorders, Journal of Psychopharmacology, Sept, 2010
The guidelines emphasize that insomnia should be diagnosed and treated because it is associated with increased risk for depression, anxiety, and cardiovascular disorders.
Treatments included:1
- Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). This is talk therapy which "consists of sessions with a therapist that focus on helping you change your habits and thoughts in a way that helps you sleep."2 It is considered so effective and long lasting (compared to drugs) that BAP says it should be offered as first-line treatment.
- Hypnotic drugs (sleeping pills). BAP recommends that efficacy, safety, duration of action, and history of substance abuse or dependence be considered. They also say patients should take breaks from these meds every 3 or 6 months to reduce risk of dependency.
- Antidepressants.
- Antipsychotic drugs. Because of adverse effects and possible abuse these arent indicated as first-line treatment for sleep disorders.
- Antihistamines (Sominex, Nytol). These have a limited role and can cause drowsiness.
- Hormone therapy for women after menopause
- Melatonin
- Scheduled light exposure
- Behavioral strategies
1New Guidelines Issued For Insomnia And Other Sleep Disorders, Medscape, Sept 2 2010
2 Talking Therapy ‘Best Option For Insomnia’, WebMD, Sept 2 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)