Showing posts with label safe. Show all posts
Showing posts with label safe. Show all posts
Pregnant Drinking Green Tea Is it safe
Thursday, May 22, 2014
Pregnant Drinking Green Tea, Is it safe? - Green tea has many health benefits. No wonder the drinks or green tea products is sought and consumed all ages to get the benefits. But be caul, green tea also has side effects if taken while pregnant.
Well, fans of green tea should consult with your doctor before taking green tea. Quoted from Boldsky, the following are some risks of green tea consumption during pregnancy:
1. Affect the level of folic acid
Increased consumption of green tea can affect the levels of folic acid in the body. Folate deficiency can cause neural defects in babies, such as spina bifida, in which the tube around the central nervous system fails to close completely.
2. Caffeine
Remember that green tea also contains caffeine in moderation. Experts advise to keep the amount of caffeine intake during pregnancy.
3. Affect iron absorption
Too much green tea can affect your health because it can reduce the absorption of iron in the body. Iron is essential during pregnancy, so it is recommended to enjoy green tea in sufficient quantities during pregnancy.
4. Low birth weight for babies
Increased intake of green tea found to be associated with low birth weight in infants. It is considered as the effect of caffeine in green tea. Green tea contains 20-50 mg of caffeine per serving depending on different varieties.
5. Dehydration
Because caffeine is a diuretic, increased consumption of green tea can affect your health by making the body dehydrated. Diuretics cause increased excretion of water, so do not be too much to eat.
6. Caffeine into placenta
Caffeine will reach the baby through your blood circulation by crossing the placenta. Your babys metabolism is not mature enough so it can not fully metabolize the caffeine.
All this is based on studies showing that green tea results risk during pregnancy. Well, the consumption of green tea should taste during your pregnancy.
Well, fans of green tea should consult with your doctor before taking green tea. Quoted from Boldsky, the following are some risks of green tea consumption during pregnancy:
1. Affect the level of folic acid
Increased consumption of green tea can affect the levels of folic acid in the body. Folate deficiency can cause neural defects in babies, such as spina bifida, in which the tube around the central nervous system fails to close completely.
2. Caffeine
Remember that green tea also contains caffeine in moderation. Experts advise to keep the amount of caffeine intake during pregnancy.
3. Affect iron absorption
Too much green tea can affect your health because it can reduce the absorption of iron in the body. Iron is essential during pregnancy, so it is recommended to enjoy green tea in sufficient quantities during pregnancy.
4. Low birth weight for babies
Increased intake of green tea found to be associated with low birth weight in infants. It is considered as the effect of caffeine in green tea. Green tea contains 20-50 mg of caffeine per serving depending on different varieties.
5. Dehydration
Because caffeine is a diuretic, increased consumption of green tea can affect your health by making the body dehydrated. Diuretics cause increased excretion of water, so do not be too much to eat.
6. Caffeine into placenta
Caffeine will reach the baby through your blood circulation by crossing the placenta. Your babys metabolism is not mature enough so it can not fully metabolize the caffeine.
All this is based on studies showing that green tea results risk during pregnancy. Well, the consumption of green tea should taste during your pregnancy.
Tips for safe eating grilled meat
Thursday, May 8, 2014
Tips for safe eating grilled meat - Most people simply can not resist the delicious barbeque or roast meats. This one kind of food does have a savory taste. But if the process is not really how it will bring a variety of diseases. This is it safe to eat roast beef tips reported by iVillage.
Choose your meat wisely
Avoid high-fat grilling of meat, such as ribs and sausage. Instead, choose lean meats. Fell in burning fat will add huge fire made flesh quickly charred.
Use seasoning
Seasoning can reduce the chance formation of harmful compounds and adding flavor the meat.
Reduce baking time
If the material until half cooked then just burned. This is done to save time roasting. Burn the meat too long can form harmful compounds.
Often flips
Flipping meat every minute so as not to scorch.
Cut meat in small size
cut the meat in small size and thin will make the meat cook faster evenly.
Consider vegetables
Do not forget to serve fruits and vegetables to provide anti-oxidant in the body. Vegetables and fruits also serves offset the fat content of meat you consume.
Although there is a safe way to eat grilled meat, limit yourself to the menu that you are also protected from various diseases.
Choose your meat wisely
Avoid high-fat grilling of meat, such as ribs and sausage. Instead, choose lean meats. Fell in burning fat will add huge fire made flesh quickly charred.
Use seasoning
Seasoning can reduce the chance formation of harmful compounds and adding flavor the meat.
Reduce baking time
If the material until half cooked then just burned. This is done to save time roasting. Burn the meat too long can form harmful compounds.
Often flips
Flipping meat every minute so as not to scorch.
Cut meat in small size
cut the meat in small size and thin will make the meat cook faster evenly.
Consider vegetables
Do not forget to serve fruits and vegetables to provide anti-oxidant in the body. Vegetables and fruits also serves offset the fat content of meat you consume.
Although there is a safe way to eat grilled meat, limit yourself to the menu that you are also protected from various diseases.
Natural Way to Cure Acne Safe Herbal Products
Tuesday, April 22, 2014
By: Jeramey Thompson
Withdrawal from social events, over compensation in dress, negative self image and poor body posture are other negative effects of acne. Today, there are lots of acne cure products available in market. Before choosing a product, you have to evaluate several things like your skin tone, product brand and reviews. It is best recommended to choose natural ways to cure acne for assuring fine results with no side effects. Now, let’s check in detail some of the natural techniques to eliminate acne troubles.
Intake of Siberian ginseng is an effective natural way to cure acne. This adaptogenic herbal cure, known as eleuthero is available in the form of solid extracts, capsules, tablets, powders, and as dried roots. It improves immune system and helps in keeping hormonal balance. Inclusion of food items rich in vitamin A, vitamin E and zinc is another natural cure for acne. It promotes immune system and repairs skin cells. Whole grains, vegetable oils, eggs and nuts are some recommended food items for preventing acne.
Tea tree oil, containing anti bacterial terpenes is one among the widely suggested natural cures for acne troubles. This herbal oil is obtained by steam distillation of leaves of melaleuca alternifolia plant. Tea tree oil is a very powerful anti viral, anti fungal and anti bacterial herbal remedy for acne. Application of tea tree oil to acne lesions kill bacteria and immunize your skin.
Aloe vera gel is one of the best herbal remedies to cure acne. It can be taken both internally and externally. Intake of aloe vera extract detoxifies digestive tract and improves skin tone. Reducing inflammations, promoting healing of skin and regeneration of damaged skin tissues are highlighting benefits of aloe vera gel. Most of the skin specialists recommend on having warm aloe vera bath once or twice a week. It is very effective and helps in attaining fast results.
Honey, one among the commonly suggested natural cures for acne acts as a natural astringent and antibiotic for skin. Honey in combination with milk fills empty space due to scars and increases the growth rate of cells. Application of lemon juice in affected areas is another natural cure to acne. Presence of ascorbic acid in lemon juice plays a key role in cellular growth. Topical application of rosehip seed oil, intake of tomatoes, reducing stress level and application of ice cubes on acne scars are other natural ways to cure acne.
Author Resource:-> Read about Natural Acne Treatment. Also know about Weak Eyesight Supplements.
Article From ArticleMonkeys
Natural Acne Treatment
Acne, medically termed as acne vulgaris is one among the common skin problems characterized by scaly red skin condition. Causes for the formation of acne are multifaceted. Both psychological and physical causes play equally vital roles in the development of acne. Excessive production of sebum, imbalance in hormone level, high stress condition, clogging of hair follicles and heredity are some common causes of acne. If not cured in earlier stages, persistent acne may destroy your self esteem and confidence level. It will induce a negative impact on the beauty of your skin and may cause skin troubles like scars, blemishes, rashes and patches.Withdrawal from social events, over compensation in dress, negative self image and poor body posture are other negative effects of acne. Today, there are lots of acne cure products available in market. Before choosing a product, you have to evaluate several things like your skin tone, product brand and reviews. It is best recommended to choose natural ways to cure acne for assuring fine results with no side effects. Now, let’s check in detail some of the natural techniques to eliminate acne troubles.
Natural Treatment for acne :
Following are some herbal remedies for acneIntake of Siberian ginseng is an effective natural way to cure acne. This adaptogenic herbal cure, known as eleuthero is available in the form of solid extracts, capsules, tablets, powders, and as dried roots. It improves immune system and helps in keeping hormonal balance. Inclusion of food items rich in vitamin A, vitamin E and zinc is another natural cure for acne. It promotes immune system and repairs skin cells. Whole grains, vegetable oils, eggs and nuts are some recommended food items for preventing acne.
Tea tree oil, containing anti bacterial terpenes is one among the widely suggested natural cures for acne troubles. This herbal oil is obtained by steam distillation of leaves of melaleuca alternifolia plant. Tea tree oil is a very powerful anti viral, anti fungal and anti bacterial herbal remedy for acne. Application of tea tree oil to acne lesions kill bacteria and immunize your skin.
Aloe vera gel is one of the best herbal remedies to cure acne. It can be taken both internally and externally. Intake of aloe vera extract detoxifies digestive tract and improves skin tone. Reducing inflammations, promoting healing of skin and regeneration of damaged skin tissues are highlighting benefits of aloe vera gel. Most of the skin specialists recommend on having warm aloe vera bath once or twice a week. It is very effective and helps in attaining fast results.
Honey, one among the commonly suggested natural cures for acne acts as a natural astringent and antibiotic for skin. Honey in combination with milk fills empty space due to scars and increases the growth rate of cells. Application of lemon juice in affected areas is another natural cure to acne. Presence of ascorbic acid in lemon juice plays a key role in cellular growth. Topical application of rosehip seed oil, intake of tomatoes, reducing stress level and application of ice cubes on acne scars are other natural ways to cure acne.
Author Resource:-> Read about Natural Acne Treatment. Also know about Weak Eyesight Supplements.
Article From ArticleMonkeys
4 Sports is safe to do during menstruation
Tuesday, February 25, 2014
4 Sports is safe to do during menstruation - Most women are usually advised not to do strenuous exercise during menstruation. However, exercise can actually beneficial for menstruating women. This is because exercise can improve blood circulation, reduce bloating and also helps in reducing menstrual cramps. Here are some safe exercise performed during menstruation, as reported Boldsky.
1. Jogging
If you experience bloating, you can do a leisurely jog in the morning or evening. But it is very important to keep in mind, you should not push your body. Exercise during menstruation may increase the blood circulation and metabolism pumping.
2. Abdominal exercise
Exercise abdomen during menstrual period is a great way to loosen up the abdominal muscles. You might think that doing sit-ups would be counterproductive, but it might actually be you soothe the pain you feel because of menstrual cramps.
3. Aerobic
Aerobic exercise is physical exercise that helps you to sweat during menstruation. Doing aerobics for half an hour every day also helps the body stay fit and not easy to get sick.
4. On foot
A walk around your home will make the body become reshed. This could also be the best way to cope with menstrual cramps.
Here are some gentle exercise you can do during menstruation. Good work!
1. Jogging
If you experience bloating, you can do a leisurely jog in the morning or evening. But it is very important to keep in mind, you should not push your body. Exercise during menstruation may increase the blood circulation and metabolism pumping.
2. Abdominal exercise
Exercise abdomen during menstrual period is a great way to loosen up the abdominal muscles. You might think that doing sit-ups would be counterproductive, but it might actually be you soothe the pain you feel because of menstrual cramps.
3. Aerobic
Aerobic exercise is physical exercise that helps you to sweat during menstruation. Doing aerobics for half an hour every day also helps the body stay fit and not easy to get sick.
4. On foot
A walk around your home will make the body become reshed. This could also be the best way to cope with menstrual cramps.
Here are some gentle exercise you can do during menstruation. Good work!
AHS 2012 Part 1 Safe Starches and LDL C vs LDL P
Monday, February 17, 2014
So this past weekend, I was able to attend AHS 2012 in Cambridge, MA. For those of you who dont know, the Ancestral Health Symposium is an annual event that began last year, and it brings together all of the most well-known people in the paleo community for a weekend full of lectures, debates, paleo food, and apparently, large amounts of free chocolate and coffee. Or maybe it was only me who spent half the conference eating free dark chocolate samples and drinking americanos. Oh well, coffee is life.
It was a great weekend, and I got to meet some great people who Ive learned so much from over the past couple of years. Stephan Guyenet, Chris Kresser, Mark Sisson, just to name a few. Also got to meet Laura from Ancestralize Me, which was great because shes also on the RD track and I love bitching about My Plate. I did NOT get to meet Robb Wolf, which I was really disappointed in since hes sort of the ring leader of this whole paleo movement. Maybe next time. I was so pleasantly surprised to learn how down to earth and approachable these people were. Despite their status in the community, they were willing to socialize with everyone and blend in. I really appreciated their everydayness.
Anyway, over the next few days Ill be discussing my thoughts on some of the main topics from AHS this year, and also talk about the event as a whole and what it means for the future of the paleo community. So without further ado...
Safe Starch Debate
One of the best presentations of the weekend was the safe starch debate involving Paul Jaminet, Chris Kresser, Cate Shanahan, and Ron Rosedale. Let me first just say how ridiculous it is that were even asking the question "Is there such a thing as a safe starch?" Im sorry but its stupid. Especially when it followed Chris Masterjohns great presentation, which explained very clearly how humans, as compared to apes, have evolved the ability to digest greater amounts of starch through salivary amylase. This is not debatable. Of course starch is safe. The question is, how much starch is safe for a given person? Well, according to Chris Masterjohns data, humans have varying abilities to produce salivary amylase. So there is a spectrum in terms of the ease at which humans digest starch. Some can handle it very easily and perhaps in large quantities, while others may have a hard time digesting a lot of starch.
The obvious answer to safe starch debate is... it depends. One person may be just fine on a diet high in starch from potatoes and sweet potatoes, while another person may be better off limiting their potato consumption. There is no one diet for everybody, which is why I think Chris Kresser clearly came out on top in this debate, because he understands this concept. Ron Rosedale came off as a complete idiot, in my opinion, although he did make some interesting points. He advocates a low-carb, ketogenic diet for everyone, which I completely disagree with. Cate Shanahan was on the low-carb side as well, although she was not as militant about it, and I was happy to hear her conclude with the idea that eating real food is what matters most. Not to forget about Paul Jaminet, I thought he was great in this debate as well, but having read his book, I know he is of the opinion that the optimal human carbohydrate intake is fixed at between 100-150g per day. Any more, according to him, is toxic. I just cant agree with that. So Kresser for the win.
Oh, and theres also that pesky fact that nearly all 7 billion people on earth eat a starch-based diet. I know that doesnt mean its optimal, Im just saying. Theyre not killing us.
LDL-P
The concept of LDL-P seemed to be a theme this past weekend. LDL-P stands for LDL particle number. In a typical lipid panel from your doctor, they are measuring LDL-C, or LDL concentration. According to Peter Attia, and Robb Wolf mentioned it in his talk as well, LDL-P is a much better predictor of heart disease than LDL-C.
Lets make up an example. Say you have a healthy LDL-C, as measured by your doctor, at 120 mg/dl. Thats a good thing, as far as hes concerned. But LDL can vary in size. If all those particles are small LDL particles, then there must be a lot of them to make up that concentration of 120 mg/dl. If you have a lot of LDL particles, youre at high risk of heart disease, regardless of what your LDL-C says. On the other side of the coin, you may have large LDL particles. In this case, you have fewer total particles that make up that 120 mg/dl. Here, you would be at low risk. Of course, you could also look at someone with high LDL-C, say 200 mg/dl, and you could make the case that he or she may or may not be at risk, depending on the size and total number of LDL particles.
I have been familiar with the LDL particle size idea for a while now. But according to Dr. Attia, particle size is largely irrelevant in its own rite. Small, dense LDL particles are very much associated with a higher risk for heart disease, but it is not the small LDL that are causing disease. It is because small LDL often indicates a large particle number that explains the association with heart disease. It is not the small, dense LDL itself. In a situation where someone might have low LDL-C, low LDL-P, and small particles, the risk of disease remains low. Or if someone has high LDL-C, high LDL-P and large particles, their risk of heart disease is high.
I realize this may be confusing. But heres the take home message: It looks like the LDL-C measurement, the one doctors are currently using, is largely useless. While higher LDL-C may increase the chances that youve got a high LDL-P (only makes sense, right?), the two are not necessarily connected. We need to start measuring LDL-P if were ever going to get an accurate measurement of heart disease risk.
Thats it for part 1 of my AHS review. Ive got much more to talk about, so stay tuned for the next part!
 |
| Caveman chocolate. |
It was a great weekend, and I got to meet some great people who Ive learned so much from over the past couple of years. Stephan Guyenet, Chris Kresser, Mark Sisson, just to name a few. Also got to meet Laura from Ancestralize Me, which was great because shes also on the RD track and I love bitching about My Plate. I did NOT get to meet Robb Wolf, which I was really disappointed in since hes sort of the ring leader of this whole paleo movement. Maybe next time. I was so pleasantly surprised to learn how down to earth and approachable these people were. Despite their status in the community, they were willing to socialize with everyone and blend in. I really appreciated their everydayness.
Anyway, over the next few days Ill be discussing my thoughts on some of the main topics from AHS this year, and also talk about the event as a whole and what it means for the future of the paleo community. So without further ado...
Safe Starch Debate
One of the best presentations of the weekend was the safe starch debate involving Paul Jaminet, Chris Kresser, Cate Shanahan, and Ron Rosedale. Let me first just say how ridiculous it is that were even asking the question "Is there such a thing as a safe starch?" Im sorry but its stupid. Especially when it followed Chris Masterjohns great presentation, which explained very clearly how humans, as compared to apes, have evolved the ability to digest greater amounts of starch through salivary amylase. This is not debatable. Of course starch is safe. The question is, how much starch is safe for a given person? Well, according to Chris Masterjohns data, humans have varying abilities to produce salivary amylase. So there is a spectrum in terms of the ease at which humans digest starch. Some can handle it very easily and perhaps in large quantities, while others may have a hard time digesting a lot of starch.
 |
| Chris Kresser (middle) dominating the safe starch debate |
The obvious answer to safe starch debate is... it depends. One person may be just fine on a diet high in starch from potatoes and sweet potatoes, while another person may be better off limiting their potato consumption. There is no one diet for everybody, which is why I think Chris Kresser clearly came out on top in this debate, because he understands this concept. Ron Rosedale came off as a complete idiot, in my opinion, although he did make some interesting points. He advocates a low-carb, ketogenic diet for everyone, which I completely disagree with. Cate Shanahan was on the low-carb side as well, although she was not as militant about it, and I was happy to hear her conclude with the idea that eating real food is what matters most. Not to forget about Paul Jaminet, I thought he was great in this debate as well, but having read his book, I know he is of the opinion that the optimal human carbohydrate intake is fixed at between 100-150g per day. Any more, according to him, is toxic. I just cant agree with that. So Kresser for the win.
Oh, and theres also that pesky fact that nearly all 7 billion people on earth eat a starch-based diet. I know that doesnt mean its optimal, Im just saying. Theyre not killing us.
LDL-P
The concept of LDL-P seemed to be a theme this past weekend. LDL-P stands for LDL particle number. In a typical lipid panel from your doctor, they are measuring LDL-C, or LDL concentration. According to Peter Attia, and Robb Wolf mentioned it in his talk as well, LDL-P is a much better predictor of heart disease than LDL-C.
 |
| From Dr. Attias presentation. This graph compares LDL-C levels with incidence of heart attack. Most heart attacks occurred in people with what is considered a "normal" level of LDL-C. What would conventional medicine do? Lower the erence range and prescribe more statins. What should we do? Get a new fucking risk factor. |
Lets make up an example. Say you have a healthy LDL-C, as measured by your doctor, at 120 mg/dl. Thats a good thing, as far as hes concerned. But LDL can vary in size. If all those particles are small LDL particles, then there must be a lot of them to make up that concentration of 120 mg/dl. If you have a lot of LDL particles, youre at high risk of heart disease, regardless of what your LDL-C says. On the other side of the coin, you may have large LDL particles. In this case, you have fewer total particles that make up that 120 mg/dl. Here, you would be at low risk. Of course, you could also look at someone with high LDL-C, say 200 mg/dl, and you could make the case that he or she may or may not be at risk, depending on the size and total number of LDL particles.
I have been familiar with the LDL particle size idea for a while now. But according to Dr. Attia, particle size is largely irrelevant in its own rite. Small, dense LDL particles are very much associated with a higher risk for heart disease, but it is not the small LDL that are causing disease. It is because small LDL often indicates a large particle number that explains the association with heart disease. It is not the small, dense LDL itself. In a situation where someone might have low LDL-C, low LDL-P, and small particles, the risk of disease remains low. Or if someone has high LDL-C, high LDL-P and large particles, their risk of heart disease is high.
I realize this may be confusing. But heres the take home message: It looks like the LDL-C measurement, the one doctors are currently using, is largely useless. While higher LDL-C may increase the chances that youve got a high LDL-P (only makes sense, right?), the two are not necessarily connected. We need to start measuring LDL-P if were ever going to get an accurate measurement of heart disease risk.
Thats it for part 1 of my AHS review. Ive got much more to talk about, so stay tuned for the next part!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
