Showing posts with label line. Show all posts
Showing posts with label line. Show all posts
U S Public Schools and the First Line of Defense in the Early Detection and Treatment of Mental Illness
Tuesday, April 15, 2014
What the Disease Management Care Blog didnt quite appreciate was the potential role of the U.S. public school system in helping people like "Tim." It thought the fundamental purpose of teachers was to teach. Yet, when it considers that the hours that a child spends in school is an opportunity to catch problems that may be missed by parents and docs alike, the idea that schools can be a first line of defense in the early detection of mental illness has some merit.
For your consideration when youre grappling with your local school taxes:
Tim is the son of Paul Gionfriddo, who is a former Connecticut politician and current mental health advocate. As the parent of a child with schizophrenia, he knows what hes writing about.
When Mr. Gionfriddo was starting out as a legislator, he was only just becoming aware of Tims difficulties in school. What followed was heartbreaking tale of inflexible school officials arranging for the wrong evaluations, wrong diagnoses, inadequate care and wasted attempts to help a deeply troubled child. Teachers were unable to cope, the parents were often blamed and Tim got shuffled around an unresponsive school system. Despite "good" insurance, coverage fell short and many services involved onerous co-pays and limitations. And once he reached adulthood, an unwillingness to accept services moved Tim to the margins of society, leading to repeated hospitalizations and incarcerations. He now lives in squalor somewhere in San Francisco.
Tims story is not unique. According to Mr. Gionfriddo, a well meaning policy that moved hundreds of thousands of mentally ill out of decaying inpatient psychiatric hospitals in the 1980s was followed by
1) schools being unable to handle children with mental illness,
2) underfunding of community agencies, and
3) the siloing of the resources that did exist, resulting in little collaboration among physicians, law enforcement, community services or the mental health community.
Among Mr. Gionfriddos recommendations? In addition to better screening by pediatricians during the well child visit, insurance orm and better housing options, state legislators should support the following:
1. The U.S. public school system should be prepared to offer mental health services in addition to basic education;
2. Every teacher should receive training in recognizing mental illness and how to handle it;
4. Once mental illness is discovered, meaningful support should be included in a childs individualized education planning.
Image from Wikipedia
The Electronic Health Record EHR On Line Portal Increases Hospitalization Rates
Sunday, April 6, 2014
![]() |
| "Hi doc! I used my on-line portal to make an appointment!" |
Youre probably willing to continue to commit millions of dollars toward an electronic health record (EHR) coupled to an online patient portal. Thats because youve been told by your leadership team that electronic consumer empowerment, patient-provider communication and the substitution of efficient two-way messaging for costly face-to-face visits will increase quality, reduce expenses, generate shared savings and guarantee that your life-sized portrait will be prominently displayed in your flagship hospitals lobby.
Well, after youve read a just-published JAMA research study by Ted Palen, Colleen Ross, David Powers and Stanley Xu, you may want to tell your administrative assistant to cancel that appointment with the portrait artist.
The articles title is Association of Online Patient Access to Clinicians and Medical Records With Use of Clinical Services.
How the study was done:
Kaiser Permanente Colorado added "MyHealthManager" (MHM) to their EHR in May 2006. MHM allows patients to view tests, records, problem lists as well as care plans, schedule appointments, request ills and message their doctors. By June of 2009, over 375,000 Kaiser patients had signed up for MHM. Of those, about 45% had used the system at least once. Of this number, Kaiser researchers pulled the records of 44,321 persons who had been continuously enrolled in the Kaiser system for at least two years.
This group was retrospectively matched to a control group of Kaiser patients who had not signed up for MHM. The authors did this through "propensity matching." This found a similar number of patients, based on age, gender, race, number of chronic illnesses and baseline office visits who, using logistic regression analytics, appeared to be the type of patient who would otherwise sign up for MHM.
The results:
Compared to non-MHM patients, the MHM experienced an increase in hospitalization rates (20 per thousand patients) and emergency room visits (11 per thousand). In other words, for every hundred patients, the on-line portal seemed to lead to 2 extra hospitalizations and 1 extra ER visit. Both differences were statistically significant.
There were also increases in the number of office visits (.7 per patient per year), telephone calls (.3 per patient per year) and after-hour clinic visits (18.7 per thousand patients per year).
Caveats:
The authors correctly point out that this study is not perfect. Retrospective propensity matching is not as good as a randomized clinical trial; its possible that the patients who self-selected for MHM were already realtively more interested in or likely to increase their use of health care services. Results at Kaiser may not apply elsewhere.
Implications:

Despite the limitations, this study should be a wake-up call for those who believe EHR portals is a savings panacea. By increasing access to on-line services, physicians and patients may paradoxically use the system to address concerns that otherwise wouldnt come to medical attention. In other words, the EHR portal exacerbates the classic health care economics problem of supplier-induced demand.
Image from Wikipedia
Running too far too fast and too long speeds progress to finish line of life
Thursday, December 19, 2013
Limit vigorous exercise to 30 to 50 minutes a day max, say researchers
Vigorous exercise is good for health, but only if its limited to a maximum daily dose of between 30 and 50 minutes, say researchers in an editorial published online in Heart.
The idea that more and more high intensity exercise, such as marathons, can only do you good, is a myth say the US cardiologists, and the evidence shows that its likely to more harm than good to your heart.
"If you really want to do a marathon or full distance triathlon, etc, it may be best to do just one or a few and then proceed to safer and healthier exercise patterns," they warn.
"A routine of moderate physical activity will add life to your years as well as years to your life. In contrast, running too far, too fast, and for too many years may speed ones progress to towards the finishing line of life."
"Chronic extreme exercise appears to cause excessive ‘wear-and-tear’ on the heart, inducing adverse structural and electrical remodelling, which offsets some of the CV benefits and longevity improvements conferred by moderate physical activity. Thus, even though chronic extreme exercise may not kill you, it may erase many of the health advantages of regular moderate exercise. "
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
